Introduction: Unmasking the “Legal Technicality”

The world of mental health often seems governed by clear rules and established professional boundaries. Yet, beneath the surface of legal disputes and licensing debates lies a profound power struggle, one that reveals deeper systemic pathologies. This series, inspired by Adam O’Brien’s (PhD) “Diagnostic Privilege,” delves into how the seemingly benign concept of “diagnostic privilege”—the legal right of a profession to clinically diagnose—is, in fact, a battleground for control, status, and the subtle yet pervasive influence of implicit bias.

The LMHC Battle: A Symptom, Not the Disease

Consider the ongoing challenge faced by Licensed Mental Health Counselors (LMHCs) in New York State regarding their diagnostic capabilities. On the surface, it appears to be a technical dispute over educational criteria. However, O’Brien argues this is a smokescreen, obscuring a deeper “power and control dynamic” rooted in an “ethical and moral debate.” This isn’t just about who can diagnose; it’s about who holds the keys to professional authority and, more importantly, whose worldview dictates the very definition of mental health.

In a paradoxical way, O’Brien asks, referring to the Brown v Education, why were the professions not made equal in psychology, medicine, men, and women? Why were citizens made to follow the science of law when the science of psychology says that a Nation of Laws is a concrete stage of cognitive development and moral development; therefore, following the immature laws of a 7-12 year-old’s traumatized logic, reasoning, and dissociative will power that they are dependent on is the reality we are living. Citing the outcome of Castle Rock v Gonzales, why is the government not legally responsible for protecting citizens when there is a restraining order when they are not directly responsible? Does indirect mean that they cannot predict what people are going to do? Isn’t the field of psychology supposed to help the law with that? Why can psychology not? Because of the law’s addiction to addiction, which is what Dr. O’Brien is arguing is professional dissociation and the LMHC’s Diagnostic Privilege case offers a glimpse into the irony of citizens paying to be educated to diagnose so they can help other citizens pay for their care and then not allowing them to do because of some other professions privilege. Based on the systems privilege, prestige, and power, which is power and control addiction (e.g., perfectionism, altruism, and ambition) what he is saying is missing from the DSM. Why psychology cannot see it is because they have the same addiction to their denial about their profession.

Systemic “Addiction” and “Dissociation”

The core of O’Brien’s critique is that the mental health, legal, and medical systems themselves are afflicted by “addiction” and “dissociation” (because corporations and professional associations are legally people and “an embodiment of their own level of consciousness.” These aren’t just individual pathologies; they are systemic conditions. The system, in its pursuit of power, prestige, and profit, becomes “addicted” to its current structure, even if that structure perpetuates harm. This “addiction” is often accompanied by “dissociation”—a collective forgetting or turning away from its fundamental responsibility to the public by choosing career over doing the job they are being paid to do by the taxes that both citizens pay.  

Implicit Bias: The Unspoken Rule

This is where implicit bias enters the frame. When governing bodies and established professions use bureaucratic rhetoric and “law and order” terminology to assert power, they are often operating from an implicitly biased industrial worldview. This bias isn’t necessarily malicious; it’s a deeply ingrained perspective, often unconsciously held, that privileges their own narrative and exempts them from the very scrutiny they apply to others. The gatekeeping observed in the LMHC dispute isn’t just about protecting a profession’s turf; it’s a manifestation of a system unwilling or unable to acknowledge its own unconscious motivations and self-serving tendencies.  

The Healer’s Perspective: Lived Experience as Authority

O’Brien’s unique authority stems from both rigorous academic training and profound personal understanding of trauma, dissociation, and addiction. By asserting himself as a “Healer, an Educator, a Philosopher, and Psychedelic Healing Artist,” he challenges the “industrialized research” and “unconscious intentions” of “the system.” This isn’t just an academic critique; it’s a moral imperative, a call to recognize that true authority can also arise from lived experience and a commitment to moral integrity, even when it means risking one’s professional career.  

Conclusion: A Call to See Beyond the Surface

The LMHC diagnostic debate is a microcosm of a larger systemic issue. By understanding “diagnostic privilege” not merely as a legal technicality but as a symptom of systemic addiction to power and control, dissociation, and implicit bias, we begin to unmask the unseen power play that shapes our mental health landscape. In the next post, we’ll explore how the body itself holds the key to understanding the unconscious and challenging traditional diagnostic frameworks.

For more on our work and cause, consider following or signing up for newsletter or our work at woundedhealersinstitute.org or donating to our cause: HERE.

References

O’Brien, A. (2023a). Addiction as Trauma-Related Dissociation: A Phenomenological Investigation of the Addictive State. International University of Graduate Studies. (Dissertation). Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/courses/addiction-as-dissociation-model-course/

O’Brien, A. (2023b). Memory Reconsolidation in Psychedelics Therapy. In Path of the Wounded Healer: A Dissociative-Focused Phase Model for Normative and Pathological States of Consciousness: Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/courses/addiction-as-dissociation-model-course/

O’Brien, A. (2023c). Path of the Wounded Healer: A Dissociative-Focused Phase Model for Normative and Pathological States of Consciousness: Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/

O’Brien, A. (2024a). Healer and Healing: The re-education of the healer and healing professions as an advocation. Re-educational and Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/

O’Brien, A. (2024e). Path of the Wounded Healers for Thrivers: Perfectionism, Altruism, and Ambition Addictions; Re-education and training manual for Abusers, Activists, Batterers, Bullies, Enablers, Killers, Narcissists, Offenders, Parents, Perpetrators, and Warriors. Re-Education and Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/

O’Brien, A. (2025). American Made Addiction Recovery: a healer’s journey through professional recovery. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/

*This is for informational and educational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.