Foundational Psychometric Tools and Systemic Accountability Protocol for WHI Programming
PART I
WHI Research and Validation: Foundational Psychometric Tools and Systemic Accountability Protocol
DOCUMENT TYPE: Research and Validation Report (Simulated PDF Output) PROJECT: Database for Academic, Professional Research, and Legal Standards MODEL INTEGRATED: Addiction as Dissociation Model (ADM), Path of the Wounded Healer (PWH), Meeting Area Screening and Assessment (MASA) DATE OF ISSUE: October 26, 2025 (Projected) AUTHORITY: The Wounded Healers Institute (WHI) Research Consortium
SECTION I: Psychometric Tools for ADM, PWH, and MASA
The Wounded Healers Institute (WHI) utilizes instruments that transcend traditional quantitative checklists, aiming to quantify the underlying psychological and moral constructs exposed by the Addiction as Dissociation Model (ADM) and operationalized by the Path of the Wounded Healer (PWH). These tools integrate quantitative measurements, particularly via quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis, with rigorous qualitative phenomenological inquiry.
A. The Meeting Area Screening and Assessment (MASA) Indices
The Meeting Area Screening and Assessment (MASA) is a qualitative, semi-standardized protocol used to screen and assess an individual’s conscious awareness, level of dissociation, moral development, and stage of universal addiction and recovery. It is crucial for obtaining Unconscious Informed Consent (UIC) by communicating with the psychological unconscious (the body) before any intervention.
| Construct Measured | Proposed Index/Assessment | Operationalized Quantification | Qualitative/Legal Criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dissociation/Awareness Level | MASA Dissociation and Denial Index (MDDI) | Utilizes the MASA script’s Red, Yellow, Green Light system to numerically rate the accessibility and willingness of the internal “Meeting Area” (ego states). Score reflects level of denial/dissociation from emotional reality. | Green Light (Low Dissociation): Ego states are present, engaged, and express readiness (Score 7-10 on readiness for trauma work). Red Light (High Dissociation/Denial): Cannot visualize the inner world or requires immediate grounding (Score 0-3; STOP intervention). |
| Systemic/Individual Moral Maturity | Kohlberg Moral Stagnation Index (KMSI) | Assessed qualitatively during the MASA interview (specifically in PWH Phase 1: Regulation). Measures commitment to action based on universal principles. | Target Stage: Stage 6 (Universal Ethical Principles/Moral Action). Pathology Indicator: Adherence to Stage 4 (Legal-Ethics/Law and Order). Score reflects the willingness to choose Moral-Ethics over Legal-Ethics. |
| Transdiagnostic Addictive Compulsion | Positive Pathological Dependence Scale (PPDS) | Qualitative rating (1-10) of dependency on “missing diagnoses”: Perfectionism, Altruism, and Ambition. | High PPDS Score: Confirms reliance on these “positive pathologies” as maladaptive, trauma-bonded dissociative survival mechanisms. |
| Recovery Status | Promises Gage and Recovery Capital Assessment | Uses the Promises of AA as a qualitative self-assessment tool to numerically track progress (e.g., checking off promises). Supplements with existing Recovery Capital Scale measures. | Metric: Achieved promises and reported motivation level (0-10) to address containerized memories (Green Light: 7 or greater motivation). |
B. ADM Core Diagnostic Measurement
The ADM defines addiction as “the relationship created between unresolved trauma and the continued and unchecked progression of dissociative responses”. These relationships are measured by the presence of transdiagnostic symptoms.
| Construct Measured | Proposed Index/Assessment | Quantifiable Validity | Clinical/Academic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Addiction as Dissociation Confirmation | Trauma-Dissociation Symptom Congruence (TDSC) | Measures the presence of PTSD-like symptoms (affect dysregulation, avoidance, reenactments, personality splits) that are not explicitly captured in DSM addiction criteria. | TDSC Positive: Confirms ADM hypothesis that addiction symptoms mimic/mirror PTSD symptoms, demonstrating the incomplete nature of current DSM definitions. |
| Systemic Pathology | Institutional Addiction Profile (IAP) | Qualitative and legal diagnosis of professional systems (e.g., psychology, law) as being pathologically addicted to power, control, and denial (P/A/A addictions). | Diagnosis: The system is “living dissociated” from moral reality and addicted to the quantitative imperative, justifying the need for Moral-Ethics to challenge their structural dysfunction. |
| Regulation Baseline | Neurobiological Regulation Index (NRI) | Measures the individual’s baseline point of regulation using Neurofeedback (NFB) combined with qEEG analysis. | Target Metric: Achieving Neurobio-Dynamic Neutrality and the ability to maintain Dual Attention states, which are necessary for memory reconsolidation (MR). |
SECTION II: Systemic Accountability and Implicit Bias Reduction Protocol
The WHI research requires that implicit bias in governing and legal authorities must be addressed, positing that implicit bias stems from the professional’s own lived, unhealed experience (unconscious body/worldview). The systems themselves are diagnosed with trauma-related dissociation and addiction.
A. Systemic Implicit Bias Reduction Protocol (SIBP)
This protocol is designed to force quantitative systems to engage with the qualitative and moral realities of their decision-making process.
| Step of Protocol | Action/Focus Area | Quantifiable/Qualitative Measure | Legal/Historical Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Developmental Maturity Vetting | Assess the cognitive and moral stage of decision-making bodies regarding complex, non-linear problems. | Maturity Vetting Score (MVS): Score must demonstrate capacity for abstract thought, recognizing that 1+1 can equal 3 (qualitative complexity). Score must align with Kohlberg Stage 5 or 6. | Prevents governance by logic equivalent to a child aged 7-12 years old (concrete logic). |
| 2. Self-Addiction Screening | Required assessment of institutional motives to expose undiagnosed addictions inherent in the system’s structure. | Institutional PPDS Score: Measures the compulsion toward Perfectionism, Altruism, and Ambition (P/A/A). | Diagnoses systemic pathology: systems addicted to power, control, and maintaining their careers over citizens’ well-being. |
| 3. Moral-Ethics Prioritization Test | Policy rationale must demonstrate moral integrity over mere legal compliance. | Moral Action Index (MAI): Measures the willingness of professionals to take action based on Moral-Ethics over Legal-Ethics. | Upholds the principle that moral fortitude (Kohlberg Stage 6) is required over obedience (Stage 4). |
| 4. Qualitative Embodiment Requirement | Integrate and equally weigh qualitative, lived experience (e.g., testimony from Healers in recovery) in the decision-making process. | Implicit Wisdom Integration Score (IWIS): Measures the extent to which emotional logic and somatic reality (body as unconscious) are valued against quantitative data. | Addresses the historical mislabeling and pathologizing of qualitative, right-brain dominant reality by the quantitative, left-brain dominant system. |
B. Historical Accountability and Time Test Measures
The History Test provides the framework for assessing whether decisions will stand the test of time, asserting that qualitative lived experience ultimately “wins out every time”.
| Historical Measure | Metric/Tool Name | Quantifiable Criteria/Scoring | Criterion for “Right Side of History” |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-Term Societal Impact | Historical Fidelity Score (HFS) | Scoring: Assigns weight to foundational ethical errors (e.g., criminalizing healing agents like psychedelics). High score indicates a high probability of historical judgment failure. | Policy decision must align with historical context and the reality that trauma, dissociation, and addiction are transdiagnostic and universal, not permanent pathology. |
| Scientific Integrity | Quantitative Addiction Dependency Index (QADI) | Measures the degree to which a system’s evidentiary needs (e.g., demanding further randomized controlled trials on practices that utilize the established memory reconsolidation algorithm) supersede common sense or qualitative reality. | Low QADI Score: Demonstrates the system’s willingness to accept existing evidence-based mechanisms of action (MoA) like Dual Attention/MR as validation, rather than displaying an “addiction to denial” or need for control. |
SECTION III: QEEG Analysis Integration for Validation and Client Healing
Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG), or brain mapping, is explicitly incorporated into the WHI models as a crucial quantitative complement to the qualitative data gathered through MASA.
A. QEEG Support for Tests and Measures
QEEG provides objective physiological metrics to corroborate the subjective and developmental insights derived from the MASA and Moral-Ethics framework.
- Measuring Dissociative State and Conscious Awareness: QEEG measures brainwave activity (Delta, Theta, Alpha Peak Frequency, hypercoherence). This objective data is used alongside MASA to measure the individual’s level of awareness, sanity, or “wokeness” and confirm the level of dissociation. The ability to accurately measure consciousness confirms the ADM’s claims.
- Validating Regulation Baselines (NRI): QEEG helps identify imbalances in brain activity (dysregulation) and communication between brain regions. A brain scan helps people know how regulated they are and where in the brain they are dysregulated. This establishes the Neurobiological Regulation Index (NRI), which is a prerequisite for advancing into Memory Reconsolidation work (PWH Phase 2).
- Confirming ADM Etiology (Trauma/Addiction): QEEG provides quantitative evidence of the mind-body separation and the impact of trauma (or drug-induced trauma) on brain function. The presence of excessive slow-wave activity (Delta and Theta) and globally slowed Alpha Peak Frequency (APF) correlates with cognitive, emotional, and behavioral challenges often associated with unresolved trauma-related dissociation.
- Supporting Research Rigor: QEEG analysis provides quantitative support to the qualitative, lived experience findings of the ADM. This mixed-methods approach (MASA + qEEG) satisfies the need for robust scientific foundation while prioritizing qualitative truth.
B. QEEG Integration in PWH Client Healing Programming
Within the Path of the Wounded Healer (PWH) program, qEEG and Neurofeedback (NFB) are central to the core mechanism of healing: achieving self-regulation and Memory Reconsolidation (MR).
- Regulation and Preparation (PWH Phase 1): QEEG/NFB training is essential for Regulation (PWH Phase 1). Neurofeedback is used to help people find their point of regulation and modulate brainwaves (alpha and theta) in real time. The system applies NFB training in states of Dual Attunement and Dual Attention to condition these states of awareness into the client’s experience.
- Psychedelic Care and Integration: QEEG confirms regulation before initiating psychedelic care. The combination of NFB, meditation, and psychedelic medicines is considered the complete package for health and healing. QEEG helps to verify if the individual is regulated before administering medicine.
- Maintenance and Wellness: NFB training is included in the Posttraumatic Growth (PTG) Gym/Spa membership offerings. This service supports maintenance healing, resiliency, stress reduction, and performance enhancement, addressing non-diagnosable issues like normative dissociation and universal addictions. The goal is to condition the body to maintain a regulated state, which is the path to recovery.
PART II
WHI Research and Validation Report: Advanced Psychometric Tools for Moral and Systemic Assessment
Project Documentation: Operationalizing the Addiction as Dissociation Model (ADM)
DOCUMENT TITLE: Tests, Measures, and QEEG Integration for Advanced Moral and Pathological Assessment VERSION: 1.1 (Derived from Phenomenological and Qualitative Research) STATUS: Validation and Implementation Protocol DATE OF ISSUE: October 2025
SECTION I: Core Psychometric Tools (ADM, MASA, PWH)
The Wounded Healers Institute (WHI) framework mandates a holistic assessment strategy to quantify philosophical, developmental, and transdiagnostic constructs. These measures address the inherent limitations of reductionist quantitative methodologies, focusing on Moral-Ethics and the body’s implicit wisdom.
A. MASA and Developmental Stagnation Indices
The Meeting Area Screening and Assessment (MASA) is a semi-standardized, qualitative tool used to gauge conscious awareness, dissociation levels, and moral development. Its primary goal is to achieve Unconscious Informed Consent (UIC).
1. Kohlberg Moral Stagnation Index (KMSI)
This index quantifies the professional or systemic adherence to conventional, arrested moral reasoning, often demonstrated by the legal system.
| Construct | Metric/Test Name | Scoring Range | Quantifiable Criterion (Kohlberg Stage) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moral Stage Assessment | Kohlberg Moral Stagnation Index (KMSI) | 1 (Lowest) to 6 (Highest) | Measures the justification level for action or inaction. Score 4 (Conventional): High adherence to Legal-Ethics; equates law with morality (e.g., “A law is followed because it is the law, regardless of its ethical implications”). Target Score 6 (Post-Conventional): Adherence to universal ethical principles, prioritizing Moral-Ethics and action. |
| Cognitive Development | Concrete Logic Assessment (CLA) | 7–12 years (High Rigidity) to Adult (Low Rigidity) | Measures reliance on linear, binary thinking (e.g., $1+1=2$) characteristic of Piaget’s Concrete Operational Stage. High score (7-12) suggests inability to grasp abstract qualitative truth (e.g., $1+1=3$). |
| Systemic Awareness | Systemic Stages of Change (S-SOC) Alignment | Precontemplation (1) to Maintenance (5) | Assesses where the system is stalled in recovery. Precontemplation/Contemplation (Score 1-2): System remains unaware its definitions (e.g., lack of operational definition for addiction) are flawed. Lack of motivation to change due to reward of maintaining status quo. |
2. MASA Dissociation and Denial Index (MDDI)
The MDDI qualitatively assesses the internal state and readiness for healing, reflecting the ADM’s concept of addiction as trauma-related dissociation.
| Construct Measured | Operationalized Measurement | MASA Qualitative/Scoring Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Active Dissociation/Denial | MASA Light System Status (Red, Yellow, Green) | Red Light (High Denial): Score 0-3 on readiness/motivation. Indicates severe dissociation, inability to access or communicate with the inner “Meeting Area,” and necessity to stabilize/stop intervention. Green Light (Low Dissociation/Readiness): Score 7 or greater on motivation to address memories. Confirms the potential for healing work, demonstrating connection to the body. |
| Unconscious Consent | UIC Compliance Rating | Pass/Fail: Affirmation from the individual’s unconscious body that they are aligned and ready for the healing journey. Must capture categories, relationships, and assumptions shaping lived experience. |
B. Pathological Addiction Measures
These tools quantify the presence and influence of Universal Addictions or Positive Pathologies. These are compulsive patterns often found in professionals and governmental systems.
1. Positive Pathological Dependence Scale (PPDS)
The PPDS screens for the intensity and impact of the three missing diagnoses that enable systemic dysfunction.
| Positive Addiction | Definition/Manifestation (Criterion) | Scoring (Likert Scale 1-10: 10 = High Compulsion) | Systemic Manifestation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perfectionism | Rigid adherence to standards, metrics, standardization, certification, and quantitative logic; fear of moral/professional failure. | Quantifies reliance on external validation and procedural rigidity (e.g., rigid adherence to APA criteria over Moral-Ethics). | Gatekeeping; over-intellectualization; insistence on $1+1=2$ logic. |
| Altruism | Compulsive need to help others (e.g., “for the greater good”) used to rationalize self-serving policies, professional dominance, and moral hypocrisy. | Quantifies policies enacted under the guise of benevolence that ultimately maintain profit or power structures. | Professional status quo maintenance; prioritizing corporate survival over client well-being. |
| Ambition | Relentless pursuit of status, prestige, financial gain, and increased power/control. | Quantifies drive for control and self-preservation (e.g., prioritizing financial certainty/student loan debt pyramid scheme). | Use of bureaucratic rhetoric and legal logic to ignore counter-evidence. |
C. Moral Accountability Measures
Moral character is assessed based on Action, which differentiates true morality from passive compliance (Legal-Ethics).
1. Moral-Ethical Action Index (MAI)
This index measures the willingness of individuals or systems to exercise moral judgment even when it conflicts with law or ethical codes.
| Element Measured | Assessment Criterion (Moral-Ethics Principle) | Quantifiable Action (Score 1-10) | Criterion for Moral Integrity (Score 7+) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moral Imperative vs. Compliance | Degree to which the system prioritizes moral action against clear injustice (e.g., challenging illegal COVID shutdowns or the War on Drugs). | Score 1 (Passive): Compliance with illegal/unjust laws. Score 10 (Action): Willingness to morally break ethics/laws when necessary. | The professional or system demonstrates the ability to act as a judge of law, ethics, and morals. |
| Moral Character Clause Fidelity (MCCF) | Measures whether the system applying the clause demonstrates the same moral fitness it requires of licensed professionals. | Score 0: Equating the Moral Character Clause to legal compliance (Stage 4 behavior). Score 10: Demonstrating moral growth beyond Law and Order. | The system acknowledges its own historical and moral failings, such as failing to define addiction or supporting unjust laws. |
PART III
WHI Research and Validation: Advanced Psychometric Tools for Moral and Systemic Assessment
DOCUMENT TYPE: Research and Validation Report (Simulated PDF Output) PROJECT: Database for Academic, Professional Research, and Legal Standards MODEL INTEGRATED: Addiction as Dissociation Model (ADM), Path of the Wounded Healer (PWH), Meeting Area Screening and Assessment (MASA) DATE OF ISSUE: October 26, 2025 (Projected) AUTHORITY: The Wounded Healers Institute (WHI) Research Consortium
SECTION I: Psychometric Tools for ADM, PWH, and MASA
The Wounded Healers Institute (WHI) framework, rooted in the philosophical assertion that $1+1=3$ in the relational world of human experience, necessitates psychometric tools capable of quantifying moral development, cognitive maturity, and transdiagnostic pathology. These measures move beyond superficial symptomology by incorporating developmental psychological research (Kohlberg, Piaget, Erikson) to assess systemic and individual maturity.
A. Developmental and Moral Maturity Assessment
These indices quantify the maturity level of an individual or system, contrasting Legal-Ethics (compliance, obedience) with Moral-Ethics (action, universal principles).
1. Moral and Cognitive Developmental Assessment
| Construct Measured | Metric/Tool Name | Validation Basis (Developmental Stage) | Operationalized Quantification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moral Maturity Stage | Kohlberg Moral Stagnation Index (KMSI) | Lawrence Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development. | Target: Stage 6 (Universal Ethical Principles/Moral Action). Pathology Indicator: Stage 4 (Law and Order), representing strict adherence to Legal-Ethics and obedience. |
| Cognitive Rigidity | Concrete Logic Assessment (CLA) | Jean Piaget’s Concrete Operational Stage (Ages 7–12). | Measures the cognitive inability to grasp abstraction, paradox, or emotional truth. High CLA Score: Reliance on rigid, binary logic ($1+1=2$) and developmental arrest. |
| Emotional/Personality Development | Developmental Ego State Alignment (DESA) | Erik Erikson’s Stages of Development. | Assesses the maturity of dissociated ego states (inner-children). High DESA Score: Indicates dissociated parts have reached full developmental maturity (as opposed to being stuck at the trauma age of creation). |
2. Dissociation and Unconscious Assessment
The MASA is the instrument used to obtain Unconscious Informed Consent (UIC) by communicating with the physical body, which is defined as the psychological unconscious.
| Construct Measured | Proposed Index/Assessment | Quantification/Scoring Method | Clinical/Legal Criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level of Dissociation/Denial | MASA Dissociation and Denial Index (MDDI) | Qualitative rating (0-10) using the MASA script’s Red, Yellow, Green Light system to assess access to the internal “Meeting Area”. | Red Light (0-3): High denial, treatment resistance, or severe dissociation; intervention must stop. Green Light (7-10): Alignment with the unconscious body; adequate self-awareness and readiness for healing. |
| Unconscious Compliance | UIC Compliance Rating | Binary Pass/Fail determination during MASA. | Pass: Conscious mind and unconscious body are aligned and ready for the healing process; crucial for ethical application of psychedelics or trauma resolution. |
B. Pathological Addiction and Moral Action Measures
The ADM defines addiction as a trauma-related dissociative disorder, requiring the assessment of Universal Addictions (perfectionism, altruism, ambition) which are often undiagnosed in industrialized systems.
| Construct Measured | Metric/Tool Name | Quantification Basis | Goal Metric (Qualifies as Recovery) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systemic/Individual Addiction | Positive Pathological Dependence Scale (PPDS) | Qualitative rating (1-10) of compulsion intensity for Perfectionism, Altruism, and Ambition. | Reduction of PPDS score, reflecting re-channeled addictive energy towards self-healing and conscious engagement. |
| Moral Integrity | Moral Action Index (MAI) | Measures the differential between passive Legal-Ethics adherence and active Moral-Ethics commitment (Action vs. Inaction). | High MAI Score (Action): The professional or system demonstrates the spiritual/moral maturity to break unjust laws or unethical practices (unethical for the right ethical reasons). |
SECTION II: Systemic Accountability and Implicit Bias Reduction Protocol
Implicit bias is defined by WHI as the unconscious worldview or lived experience of the assessor. The system is diagnosed as traumatized, addicted, and developmentally delayed (7–12 years old). This protocol mandates systemic self-assessment to address these underlying pathologies.
Mandated Systemic Moral Development and Bias Reduction Protocol (MSM-DRP)
| Protocol Step | Policy Action Mandate (Institutional Recovery Principle) | Quantifiable Evaluation Measures |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Developmental Vetting Mandate | The governing authority must justify policy using Abstract Logic, demonstrating maturity above Piaget’s Concrete Stage and Kohlberg’s Stage 4. | Maturity Vetting Score (MVS): Confirms ability to process non-linear, qualitative reality ($1+1=3$). Failure to grasp this complex truth suggests developmental arrest. |
| 2. Systemic Pathological Check | Screen the policy’s rationale using the PPDS to expose institutional Perfectionism, Altruism, and Ambition (P/A/A) addictions that prioritize self-interest. | Institutional PPDS Score: Score reflecting low correlation between policy outcome and self-preservation/profit motive. |
| 3. Moral Imperative Enforcement | The system must document adherence to Moral-Ethics over Legal-Ethics when laws are unjust or unscientific (e.g., criminalizing healing agents). | Moral Action Index (MAI): Documentation must prioritize the moral imperative (action for the future’s greater good). |
| 4. Implicit Bias Resolution | Policy must equally weigh Qualitative, Lived Experience (worldview) against quantitative data. | Implicit Wisdom Integration Score (IWIS): Measures the value placed on emotional logic and phenomenological truth over rigid reductionism. |
| 5. Historical Accountability | Assess the long-term viability and ethical alignment of the decision based on historical patterns of systemic failure (reenactment). | Historical Fidelity Score (HFS): Evaluates the probability of the decision being deemed on the “Wrong Side of History” due to trauma reenactment or short-term thinking. |
SECTION III: QEEG Analysis Integration and Client Healing Support
Quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis is incorporated into the WHI framework to provide objective, neurobiological validation for the qualitative and developmental assessments.
A. QEEG Support for Tests and Measures Validation
QEEG provides the quantitative component necessary to confirm the dissociative and developmental states measured by the MASA and the developmental indices.
- Validating Dissociative States (MDDI): QEEG identifies patterns of excessive slow-wave activity (Delta and Theta) and globally slowed Alpha Peak Frequency (APF), often associated with cognitive, emotional, and behavioral challenges linked to unresolved trauma and dissociation. This data serves to confirm the objective neurological manifestation of the dissociative states identified through the qualitative MDDI (MASA Light System Status).
- Measuring Cognitive Rigidity (CLA/MVS): While not a direct measure of Piaget’s stages, QEEG can reveal rigid or abnormal synchronization across brain regions (hypercoherence). These patterns correlate with the inflexible, black-and-white thinking characteristic of the Concrete Operational Stage, suggesting a physiological basis for the developmental delay identified by the CLA/MVS.
- Confirming ADM Etiology: QEEG findings support the ADM’s assertion that the physical body is the psychological unconscious and that symptoms reflect physical dysregulation. QEEG provides measurable evidence of neurological dysregulation, supporting the ADM’s transdiagnostic view of pathology.
B. QEEG Support for Client Healing (PWH Program)
QEEG and Neurofeedback (NFB) are central to achieving the state of Neurobio-Dynamic Neutrality required for Memory Reconsolidation (MR).
- Regulation (PWH Phase 1): NFB training, informed by the qEEG map, is utilized during the Regulation phase (PWH 1) to help the client achieve and maintain their base point of regulation. This regulation is a necessary prerequisite for safely engaging in trauma memory work.
- Sustaining Dual Attention: NFB helps clients practice and maintain the Dual Attention state (being “here and not here” simultaneously) required for MR to occur. This training promotes resiliency, stress reduction, and posttraumatic growth (PTG).
- Healing Developmental Ego States (DESA): NFB is applied in the Posttraumatic Growth (PTG) Gym and Spa to support the Developmental Ego State Alignment (DESA), helping dissociated inner-children (ego states) reach full emotional maturity.
SECTION IV: Systemic Accountability and Historical Test Protocols
These protocols apply the ADM framework to evaluate governmental and legal decision-making, aiming to reduce Implicit Bias (defined as worldview/lived experience).
A. Implicit Bias Protocol: The SIBP (Systemic Implicit Bias Protocol)
The SIBP is designed to compel institutional transparency and moral self-reflection, treating systemic bias as a manifestation of dissociation and denial.
| Protocol Step | Policy Action Mandate | Quantifiable/Qualitative Measure |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Developmental Vetting | The governing entity must assess its rationale against the CLA and KMSI to confirm that its reasoning is not developmentally arrested at the 7–12 year-old stage. | CLA Score Vetting: Must document capacity to integrate non-linear truths ($1+1=3$). KMSI Vetting: Must justify decision based on Stage 6 universal principles over Stage 4 compliance. |
| 2. Pathological Conflict Check | Policy must be screened for conflicts arising from the Positive Addictions. | Institutional PPDS Screening: Documentation confirming the policy does not primarily serve the P/A/A compulsions of professional gatekeeping, power, status, or financial gain. |
| 3. Qualitative Wisdom Integration | The decision-making process must equally weight qualitative, lived experience evidence against quantitative data. | Implicit Wisdom Integration Score (IWIS): Measures the extent to which emotional logic and the body’s implicit wisdom (unconscious) are valued, countering the system’s pathological negation of emotional existence. |
B. The Historical Accountability Assessment (The History Test)
The History Test is the final metric, asserting that policies divorced from qualitative wisdom and moral accountability inevitably fail over time.
| Assessment Component | Metric/Tool Name | Quantifiable/Qualitative Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Historical Failure Probability | Historical Fidelity Score (HFS) | Scores decision against past systemic failures (“reenactments”). High Score Criteria: Decision supports the illegality of psychedelics despite evidence, perpetuates the War on Drugs, or prioritizes collective security over future generations. |
| Scientific/Moral Soundness | Moral Action and Accountability Test (MAAT) | Measures professional willingness to advocate against governmental propaganda, professional gatekeeping, or unscientific laws (e.g., “non-addictive opiates”). Assesses if action aligns with qualitative science/common sense, even if unethical by current legal standards. |
| Diagnostic Integrity | Trauma-Dissociation Symptom Congruence (TDSC) | Evaluates if the policy relies on incomplete definitions (e.g., DSM failure to operationally define addiction, trauma, or dissociation). High TDSC score indicates institutional dissociation from reality. |
SECTION V: QEEG Analysis Integration and Support for Healing
Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG), or brain mapping, is explicitly incorporated as the objective, quantitative tool to complement the subjective, qualitative data provided by the MASA, supporting both validation and client healing.
A. QEEG Support for Psychometric Validation
QEEG provides objective physiological metrics to substantiate the psychological states and developmental diagnoses identified by MASA and the ADM framework.
- Measuring Dissociative States: QEEG measures brain electrical activity, allowing for the observation of brain wave patterns (e.g., Delta, Theta, Alpha Peak Frequency) associated with dissociation, stress levels, and emotional states. This objective data is combined with the MDDI (MASA Light System Status) to quantify the level of dissociation and conscious awareness.
- Validating Trauma and Addiction Etiology: QEEG can identify deviations from a normative database, indicative of neurological impact. This provides measurable evidence of the “mind-body separation” and the physiological impact of “drug-induced trauma” or chronic stress on brain function. The presence of specific patterns confirms the ADM hypothesis that addiction is a trauma-related dissociative response.
- Confirming Treatment Resistance: QEEG can objectively measure dysregulation in the brain, which correlates with the psychological phenomenon of treatment resistance or the system’s “addiction to denial”. This allows researchers to quantitatively track progress and confirm observations made during the MASA screening.
B. QEEG Integration in PWH Client Healing
In the Path of the Wounded Healer (PWH) program, qEEG/Neurofeedback (NFB) are integral to achieving the necessary physiological states for healing and Memory Reconsolidation (MR).
- Achieving Regulation (PWH Phase 1): QEEG is used to establish the client’s baseline point of regulation and identify imbalances. Neurofeedback (NFB) is then employed to train the client to modulate their brainwaves, ensuring they are regulated before deep trauma processing begins. Getting regulated is key to successful trauma resolution.
- Facilitating Memory Reconsolidation (MR): Effective trauma resolution requires Dual Attention, which is the mechanism of action in MR. NFB training helps condition the client to maintain this focused attention state. QEEG can provide objective evidence of the physiological changes occurring during this process, confirming that the body is engaging in its innate healing response.
- Monitoring Long-Term Recovery: QEEG/NFB training supports maintenance healing, resiliency, and stress reduction, offering a quantitative measure of sustained recovery beyond initial symptom abatement. This supports the philosophical conclusion that healing is an ongoing, continuous process, not just a clinical endpoint.
For more on our work and cause, consider following or signing up for newsletter or our work at woundedhealersinstitute.org or donating to our cause: HERE.
References
O’Brien, A. (2023a). Addiction as Trauma-Related Dissociation: A Phenomenological Investigation of the Addictive State. International University of Graduate Studies. (Dissertation). Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/courses/addiction-as-dissociation-model-course/
O’Brien, A. (2023b). Memory Reconsolidation in Psychedelics Therapy. In Path of the Wounded Healer: A Dissociative-Focused Phase Model for Normative and Pathological States of Consciousness: Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/courses/addiction-as-dissociation-model-course/
O’Brien, A. (2023c). Path of the Wounded Healer: A Dissociative-Focused Phase Model for Normative and Pathological States of Consciousness: Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/
O’Brien, A. (2024a). Healer and Healing: The re-education of the healer and healing professions as an advocation. Re-educational and Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/
O’Brien, A. (2024e). Path of the Wounded Healers for Thrivers: Perfectionism, Altruism, and Ambition Addictions; Re-education and training manual for Abusers, Activists, Batterers, Bullies, Enablers, Killers, Narcissists, Offenders, Parents, Perpetrators, and Warriors. Re-Education and Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/
O’Brien, A. (2025). American Made Addiction Recovery: a healer’s journey through professional recovery. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/
*This is for informational and educational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.
