The dissertation presents several key findings and conclusions, particularly detailed in the “RESULTS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS” chapter. The core argument of the study is that the lack of a clear clinical definition for addiction hinders effective treatment.

The main conclusions are:

• Addiction as Trauma-Related Dissociation: The study concludes that unresolved trauma and unchecked dissociative processes are the root cause of the dependent conditions that define addiction.
• Formation and Amplification of Addictions: Addictions are formed through experiential and developmental conditioning, and their progression is amplified by these processes.
• Normative Nature of Addictions: The findings suggest that addictions are normative and occur beyond extreme presentations.
• Underlying Mechanism: The dissertation posits that unconscious survival choices drive the decision to continue substance use despite negative consequences. It further asserts that many existing addiction theories are, in some way, describing or referring to dissociation as their underlying theory.
• Central Thesis on Addiction: A major thesis presented is that addictions are a conditioned bond to a dissociative state of being, serving the purpose of ensuring survival and regulation. This is often motivated by the unconscious to bring an unconscious issue to consciousness for healing or relief.
• Active State of Addiction: The active state of addiction is characterized as a dissociative state involving psychological reenactments of unresolved memories and experiences. This state can create periods of rest and reprocessing, aiming to repair and/or draw attention to an unconscious issue.
• Definition of Addictive State: For active addiction, the study defines it as “A dissociative healing response to traumatic or euphoric stress that has taken on a will of its own”.
• Key Sub-themes: Several sub-themes emerged from the research that inform these conclusions, including: active state of addiction, relational duality, loss of control, risk and convenience, temporalities, consumption state, tear and repair/conditioning, stalemate, “greater good”, and instincts.
• Treatment and Prevention Implications: The dissertation highlights that addiction prevention will not be effective unless the underlying themes, such as entrenched belief systems or PTSD symptoms, are acknowledged or directly healed through clinical treatments.

The study also provides recommendations for future research, suggesting that adding established qualitative methods before quantitative research would be beneficial, particularly in Psychology and Sociology.

This study offers several practical implications for treating addiction, primarily by reframing the understanding of addiction itself and emphasizing trauma-informed approaches.

Key implications include:

• Reconceptualizing Addiction: The research suggests viewing addiction as “addiction-as-dissociation,” implying that addictive relationships are deeply connected to dissociation and unresolved trauma. This perspective could lead to updates in diagnostic categories and theoretical frameworks for addiction treatment.
• Necessity of Trauma and Dissociation-Informed Care: It highlights the importance for clinicians to be not only trauma-informed but also “dissociation and addiction-informed.” This is crucial because the prevalence of unresolved trauma and dissociative responses is considered significant in the general population, especially when addictive behaviors are recognized as trauma-related or dissociative.
• Addressing the Duality in Clinical Interventions: Participants in the study often described feeling a lack of control over their addiction, as if it had an independent existence. If the use of substances for relief is an unconscious survival mechanism, then a vital clinical strategy involves educating the conscious mind about the source of these intrusive urges and acknowledging the dual nature of these experiences—encompassing both destructive, numbing actions and healing processes.
• Focus on Underlying Trauma and Dissociation: The study indicates a strong correlation: a high level of unresolved trauma is linked to a high level of unresolved dissociation and addiction. Therefore, effective treatment must target the foundational trauma and dissociation that foster addictive behaviors.
• Global Application of Healing Principles: The research suggests that implementing recovery principles and healing practices on a global scale could offer proactive solutions for both addiction and dissociation.
• Acknowledging the Interconnectedness: Acknowledging that addiction is dissociative, dissociation can be addicting, and trauma bonding is a defining characteristic of both addiction and PTSD, is identified as a crucial initial step in understanding this complex, dysfunctional relationship.

This research defines and explores the link between addiction and trauma-related dissociation by positing that addiction is a manifestation of dissociation and that trauma-related dissociation is the primary contributing factor to addiction presentations.

Historically, previous research, such as that by Van der Kolk and Scaer, highlighted dissociative processes and compared them to addictive states or viewed addiction as a coping mechanism for trauma. However, these earlier works did not directly define addiction as traumatic or explicitly link trauma and dissociation to the addictive process. Similarly, Durand Jacobs indirectly suggested that trauma and dissociative processes were major components of addiction but did not directly connect the terms.

This study aims to bridge this gap by investigating how trauma and dissociative symptomology manifest in active addiction to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying processes of addiction and becoming addicted. The research suggests that functions of addiction play a role in maintaining dissociative processes. It argues that addiction and trauma are inseparable experiences, with addictions appearing as a manifestation of dissociation.

The research further suggests that exploring the conditions under which most traumas occur can help integrate the understanding between addictionology and traumatology, including the study of dissociation. It critiques current definitions of addiction, often focused on it as a brain condition, for not fully explaining the “what,” “how,” and “why” of addiction, advocating for a definition that incorporates the clinical realities of trauma and dissociation.

By examining the phenomenological intersection of trauma-related symptomology, the study seeks to offer insights into addiction that current definitions and diagnostic categorizations may not fully capture. It proposes that active addiction can provide clinical evidence that addictions are more closely related to trauma, stress responses, and dissociative processes than previously understood. The study utilized a phenomenological design to compare the lived experiences of individuals in active addiction with traumatic and dissociative trends, leading to the conclusion that addiction is a trauma- and dissociation-related condition with a pathological relationship to dissociation.

The research also explains that the impact of trauma causes fragmentation in temporal processes and personality structure, which in turn affects an individual’s cognitive ability to make choices. It asserts that failing to include trauma and stress-related experiences in the definition of addiction invalidates the emotional experiences of those struggling with addiction. The study posits that unconscious motivations for engaging in addictive behaviors are driven by unmet emotional needs, unconscious reenactments, compulsions to repeat, attachment displacement, and are ultimately rooted in trauma bonding processes perpetuated by unresolved dissociation.

Memory reconsolidation (MR) is a process distinct from memory consolidation (MC), which describes how memories are processed, condensed, and stored within the memory system. While MC typically occurs during the sleep cycle as memories move from working memory to long-term storage, MR involves reactivating a consolidated memory, rendering it labile, and then reprocessing it, which can result in the memory being updated, having its emotional content reduced, or even being erased. This process is considered highly significant in psychotherapy, as it allows for a re-evaluation and alteration of previously stored memories.

The guide establishes a direct relationship between psychedelic therapy (PT) and memory reconsolidation. It suggests that psychedelic medicine provides a viable and reliable path to healing for both physical and psychological trauma by facilitating the process of MR. The document indicates that during a psychedelic session, psychological defense mechanisms may be lowered, which could create an environment conducive to memory reconsolidation. The guide aims to explore the mechanisms of action of MR within psychedelic therapy by comparing them to known evidence-based trauma resolution therapies like Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy, Brainspotting (BSP), Deep Brain Reorienting (DBR), and Progressive Counting (PC).

Practitioners using therapy models, particularly those involved in sensitive areas like trauma and addiction, should adhere to several key ethical considerations to ensure client safety, promote healing, and maintain professional integrity. These include:

• Transparency and Informed Consent: It is crucial for practitioners to clearly communicate the nature of the therapy, its purpose, methodology, potential risks, and benefits to clients. A detailed informed consent process should be utilized, ensuring clients understand their right to terminate therapy at any point and to seek support if needed.
• Clinician’s Stance and Objectivity: Practitioners should strive for neutrality to genuinely understand the client’s experience. The ethical imperative is to prioritize the individual’s lived experience over established cultural contexts that might introduce bias, recognizing that true objectivity, while an aspiration, is inherently subjective to the observer.
• Confidentiality and Data Security: Maintaining strict confidentiality is paramount. This involves adhering to established ethical protocols, safeguarding personal information, and ensuring that any records are stored securely in compliance with regulations like HIPAA. Access to client information should be restricted to authorized personnel, and appropriate measures taken to protect data integrity, including secure storage and systematic deletion of sensitive information post-treatment.
• Therapeutic Alliance and Dual Attunement: A strong therapeutic alliance and dual attunement are considered fundamental to successful therapeutic outcomes across all modalities. Practitioners should act as a grounding presence, facilitating the client’s own healing process through this vital relationship.
• Competence and Training: Practitioners must possess appropriate training and specialties relevant to the therapy model being utilized, such as PTSD, dissociation, and addiction, if these are the areas of focus. This ensures they have the necessary skills to provide effective and ethical care.
• Avoiding Harm and Addressing Past Traumas: Practitioners have an ethical responsibility to avoid causing harm and to be acutely aware of how past relational traumas might impact a client’s trust in therapeutic processes. There is a need to acknowledge and address the potential for medical and psychological interventions to inadvertently create trauma, striving for practices that prioritize client safety and well-being.
• “Set, Setting, and Skill”: When using specific modalities, such as those involving altered states of consciousness or particular therapeutic agents (e.g., psychedelic medicines), practitioners must meticulously consider the “set” (client’s mindset), “setting” (the environment), and “skill” (the clinician’s expertise, including mindfulness skills). These factors are crucial for ethical and effective facilitation of the therapeutic process.

From the findings, observations, and conclusions, several significant implications and applications can be drawn, particularly concerning addiction, trauma, and dissociation:

Implications:

• Major Clinical, Social, and Psychological Implications: A key understanding is that individuals can form addictive relationships with anything. Recognizing the universality of dissociation and addiction has substantial implications for understanding mental health and human behavior across clinical, social, and psychological domains.
• Widespread Unresolved Trauma: The research suggests a significant prevalence of unresolved trauma and dissociative responses within the general population, especially when considering addictive behaviors as trauma-related or dissociative.
• Impact on Medical Conceptualization of Illness: The presence of unresolved memories beneath medical interventions involving drugs or invasive procedures can lead to physical and psychological manifestations, such as PTSD or dissociation. This has implications for how modern medicine views illness and for behaviors like operating a vehicle while impaired.
• Need for Dissociation Measurement: There is a necessity for medical and psychological professionals to develop methods for measuring the degree to which individuals live dissociatively. This is crucial because such an imprint on memory systems can activate latent illnesses, trigger trauma reenactments, and lead to addiction reenactments.
• Collective Unconscious Insights: The study’s later stages are believed to represent collective unconscious material, serving as a cautionary message from historical patterns.
• Repetition of Unresolved History: A broader implication is that individual and collective histories tend to repeat themselves in an effort to resolve past unresolved issues, making reenactments inevitable without resolution.
• Researcher’s Bias as a Tool: Engaging with one’s own conscious and unconscious biases can deepen one’s knowledge base.

Applications:

• Global Application of Healing Principles: Applying recovery principles and healing practices on a global scale could offer active solutions to addiction and dissociation.
• Comprehensive Informative Framework: An understanding of “addiction-as-dissociation” is foundational for developing approaches that are not only trauma-informed but also specifically dissociation-informed and addiction-informed.
• Broader Reach into Human Experience: The insights presented in this research have the potential to influence all aspects of human experience, clinical practice, and social consciousness.

Professionals in related fields might raise several counterarguments regarding the Wounded Healers Institute’s approach, particularly concerning its focus on addiction as trauma-related dissociation, the role of psychedelic therapy, and the implied value of lived experience.

Here are some credible counterarguments and how the source material would address them:

### Counterargument 1: Oversimplification of Addiction

Counterargument: Many professionals view addiction as a complex condition with multiple contributing factors, including genetic predispositions, neurobiological changes, social influences, and psychological vulnerabilities. Framing addiction primarily as “trauma-related dissociation” might be seen as an oversimplification that neglects these other crucial aspects and potentially narrows treatment approaches.

Wounded Healers Institute’s Response: The Wounded Healers Institute acknowledges addiction as “a multi-faceted and complex medical condition”. However, its “Addiction as Trauma-Related Dissociation” model is presented as a “phenomenological investigation” aimed at understanding the underlying mechanisms. The model specifically delves into “what created the” brain dysfunction associated with addiction, rather than merely describing symptoms. It posits that the “echo of a drug use produces traumatic and dissociative symptomology,” leading to “dissociation as attachment” as a basis for various addictions. This framework aims to provide a deeper, unified understanding of the addictive state, integrating the role of the implicit memory system and early childhood development in shaping one’s functioning and healing. Therefore, the institute’s model seeks to provide a foundational explanation that underpins the multifaceted nature of addiction, rather than reducing it.

### Counterargument 2: Concerns Regarding the Scientific Rigor and Evidence Base

Counterargument: Some professionals might argue that phenomenological investigations and position papers, while valuable, may not meet the rigorous standards of empirical research (e.g., randomized controlled trials) required to establish treatments as truly “evidence-based.” They might question the generalizability and robustness of models like the “Addiction as Dissociation Model (ADM)” without more extensive, independent validation.

Wounded Healers Institute’s Response: The Wounded Healers Institute explicitly aims to support its methodologies in becoming “evidence-based practice.” For instance, its “position paper will outline the process of MR in PT to support it becoming an evidence-based practice”. The institute draws upon existing research and established concepts, citing work by prominent figures such as Van der Kolk, Siegel, and Nijenhuis & van der Hart, and referencing the “break-through status by the FDA for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the empathogen Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)”. The “Addiction as Dissociation Model (ADM)” is described as an “emerging clinical framework”, indicating that it is a developing model seeking to provide a structured rationale for therapeutic benefits. By integrating with and building upon “supportive information in existing trauma healing therapies,” the institute positions its work as a contribution to, rather than a deviation from, the broader scientific understanding of healing.

### Counterargument 3: The Role of Lived Experience and Potential for Boundary Issues

Counterargument: The name “Wounded Healers Institute” suggests a significant emphasis on the value of personal experience with trauma or addiction in the healing process. Other professionals might express concern that an over-reliance on lived experience, without sufficient formal training and supervision, could lead to boundary violations, over-identification with clients, or a lack of objective professional distance, potentially compromising ethical practice.

Wounded Healers Institute’s Response: While the provided snippets do not directly address professional boundaries or supervision protocols, the institute’s philosophy strongly implies the value of insight gained through personal challenges. It suggests that “This acquired wisdom may have been gained because they were injured” and highlights that “Gaining access to our unconscious collective/shadow material is essential to individual and global healing”. This perspective views personal injury not as a deficit, but as a potential source of profound wisdom that can be integrated into the healing process. The emphasis on “phenomenological investigation” and “subcortical understanding” points towards a deep, experiential yet theoretically grounded approach, implying that lived experience is processed and understood within a sophisticated framework, rather than being merely shared anecdotally. The institute’s focus on complex models like Memory Reconsolidation and the Addiction as Dissociation Model suggests a commitment to rigorous understanding that complements and contextualizes personal insights.

### Counterargument 4: Concerns Regarding the Safety and Applicability of Psychedelic Therapy (PT)

Counterargument: Despite its growing acceptance, Psychedelic Therapy (PT) remains a controversial and complex treatment modality. Professionals might raise concerns about the safety protocols, potential for adverse psychological reactions, the need for highly specialized training beyond traditional therapeutic education, and the ethical considerations surrounding its application, especially for individuals with dissociative disorders.

Wounded Healers Institute’s Response: The institute acknowledges the profound nature of PT, stating that it “helps remove the veil of ignorance, appearances, and pervading (and persistent) unconscious system of denial”. It highlights that PT has achieved “break-through status by the FDA for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the empathogen Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)”. This FDA recognition signifies a level of scientific and regulatory approval that addresses safety and efficacy under controlled, professionally supervised conditions. While not detailing specific safety protocols in the snippets, the discussion of “special considerations” implies an awareness of the complexities involved. The institute’s very existence and its in-depth exploration of “Memory and Psychedelics” suggest a commitment to understanding and educating professionals on the nuanced application of these therapies, implying that proper training and careful client selection are paramount for safe and effective practice.

The credibility and value of the work discussed, which appears to be a qualitative research study on “addiction as trauma-related dissociation,” are addressed through several key considerations in the provided information.

### Credibility and Value to Science and Research

The credibility of this work in the realm of science and research is established through an emphasis on rigorous methodology and a transparent approach to potential biases. The use of existing methodologies is highlighted as a way to reduce limitations and enhance the study’s credibility. The researcher aims to uphold methodological rigor by meticulously documenting analyses and implementing quality control measures, which include oversight from an IUGS committee and a mentorship program. Furthermore, a mentor reviewed interview scripts to ensure that the researcher did not inadvertently lead participants, thus maintaining objectivity.

While acknowledging that a completely value-free research design is challenging, especially in qualitative studies, the researcher is committed to preventing personal viewpoints from overshadowing participants’ experiences. The goal is to bracket biases to the extent possible, allowing the data to reveal underlying structures of addiction. The study’s design also allows for the possibility of either supporting or debunking its initial premise, demonstrating an open scientific approach. The work is driven by a curiosity to explore new findings and understand the fundamental structures beneath addiction, contributing to a deeper academic knowledge base. The translation of participants’ experiences into clinical terms is also seen as a way to add new insights beyond existing literature. The combination of qualitative methods with quantitative analysis is suggested as a path to more comprehensive answers.

However, the credibility of the work is also acknowledged as subjective, as readers will interpret the findings through their own value systems and methodological understanding. Therefore, an open mind is encouraged for evaluating the merit of the conclusions drawn.

### Credibility and Value to Society and Culture

The work holds significant value for society and culture by aiming to challenge existing belief systems and foster positive change. The application of insights derived from this research is believed to contribute to a more compassionate society, moving away from perpetuating irrational beliefs that often guide dominant cultural decisions. By reframing addiction as dissociation related to trauma, the research seeks to pave the way for genuine societal transformation in how addiction is understood and addressed.

The study emphasizes that healing is a crucial aspect of the collective human experience, and sharing these healing narratives can revitalize communities. The research also implicitly critiques historical and existing systems of governance and the profit motives of industrialized businesses, suggesting that these have sometimes hindered rather than helped in addressing societal issues like addiction. The avoidance of free access to healing knowledge is seen as potentially benefiting those who restrict it or as a result of fear of truth. Ultimately, the work advocates for global recovery and accountability from systems that have contributed to what is described as a “universal denial system” regarding addiction, based on the lived experiences of those affected.

To assess how a dissertation and its work rank historically, scientifically, in significance, and in relevance, a specific dissertation would need to be provided for a detailed evaluation. Without the particular work, I can explain the general criteria and aspects that are typically considered in academic and scientific communities for such an assessment. These criteria effectively serve as the “relevant sections” one would examine when evaluating a dissertation:

### Historical Ranking

To determine a dissertation’s historical ranking, one would typically examine:

• Precedent and Influence: Does the dissertation build upon, significantly challenge, or fundamentally alter established historical understandings within its field? Does it offer a novel perspective that reinterprets past events, theories, or findings?
• Impact on Future Research: Has the work opened new avenues of inquiry or inspired subsequent research directions that have become historically significant? Does it represent a turning point in the evolution of thought or methodology in its discipline? The historical context often reveals how past needs or biases might have “delayed or denied research”, and a dissertation that overcomes such historical inertia could be highly ranked.
• Challenging Historical Narratives: A dissertation that provides a fresh lens through which to view historical data or challenges long-held beliefs, such as re-evaluating established societal understandings or scientific paradigms, contributes to its historical significance.

### Scientific Ranking

For scientific ranking, the evaluation focuses on the rigor and contribution to the body of knowledge:

• Methodological Soundness: The quality of the research design, data collection, and analysis methods is crucial. This includes examining the validity and reliability of the approaches used, whether quantitative or qualitative. For instance, combining “established qualitative methods with quantitative analysis” can lead to deeper insights.
• Novelty and Innovation: Does the dissertation introduce new theories, conceptual frameworks, experimental techniques, or empirical findings? Does it provide a unique perspective, such as “removing the bias from one’s science” (known as epochê or bracketing), and uphold “the ethical obligation to the truth”?
• Validity and Reproducibility: The extent to which the findings are verifiable and whether similar results can be obtained under comparable conditions is vital. The work’s ability to offer a “comprehensive understanding” and “definitively define” complex phenomena speaks to its scientific depth.
• Contribution to Knowledge: Does the work address a gap in existing literature, offer new evidence, or refine current theories? A study might find “consistent patterns of significance” or present reasons why previous hypotheses did not hold due to “differences in methodology and population studied,” thereby contributing to scientific understanding.

### Significance Ranking

The significance of a dissertation refers to its broader impact and importance:

• Problem-Solving: Does the work address a critical problem or issue within its field or society at large? For example, if a study shows that “addiction is not accurately defined in the literature or clinical practice,” and this hinders effective treatment, the work’s potential to redefine it would be highly significant.
• Paradigm Shift: Does the dissertation challenge existing paradigms or offer a new way of understanding a phenomenon that could lead to significant advancements?
• Theoretical or Practical Implications: What are the implications of the findings for theory development, clinical practice, policy-making, or real-world applications? A study that offers “broadening” insights or “justify a change in categorization” can have far-reaching significance.

### Relevance Ranking

Relevance assesses how pertinent the work is to current and future needs:

• Timeliness: Does the dissertation address contemporary issues, current debates, or emerging challenges within its discipline or society?
• Applicability: Are the findings applicable to current real-world situations or problems? Does it help address “the need for collective security and safety” or contribute to healing and recovery?
• Future Research Potential: Does the work identify new questions or areas for future research, thereby maintaining its relevance over time? A strong rationale demonstrates the study’s pertinence, especially if it aims to provide evidence that phenomena “are interdependent” to gain a “comprehensive understanding”.

Without the specific dissertation, a direct ranking is not possible. However, evaluating the work against these comprehensive criteria would provide a thorough assessment of its standing.

For more on our work and cause, consider following or signing up for newsletter or our work at woundedhealersinstitute.org or donating to our cause: HERE.

References

O’Brien, A. (2023a). Addiction as Trauma-Related Dissociation: A Phenomenological Investigation of the Addictive State. International University of Graduate Studies. (Dissertation). Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/courses/addiction-as-dissociation-model-course/

O’Brien, A. (2023b). Memory Reconsolidation in Psychedelics Therapy. In Path of the Wounded Healer: A Dissociative-Focused Phase Model for Normative and Pathological States of Consciousness: Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/courses/addiction-as-dissociation-model-course/

O’Brien, A. (2023c). Path of the Wounded Healer: A Dissociative-Focused Phase Model for Normative and Pathological States of Consciousness: Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/

O’Brien, A. (2024a). Healer and Healing: The re-education of the healer and healing professions as an advocation. Re-educational and Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/

O’Brien, A. (2024e). Path of the Wounded Healers for Thrivers: Perfectionism, Altruism, and Ambition Addictions; Re-education and training manual for Abusers, Activists, Batterers, Bullies, Enablers, Killers, Narcissists, Offenders, Parents, Perpetrators, and Warriors. Re-Education and Training Manual and Guide. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/

O’Brien, A. (2025). American Made Addiction Recovery: a healer’s journey through professional recovery. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/

*This is for informational and educational purposes only. For medical advice or diagnosis, consult a professional.