The Physical Body as the Psychological Unconscious: A Medical Hypothesis on Trauma, Dissociation, and Systemic Pathology
Abstract: This paper hypothesizes that the physical body is the unconscious mind, and that the ingestion of any drug, regardless of its legal status or intended purpose or modern medical reasoning, can constitutes a traumatic event to the unconscious body if the conscious mind cannot give unconscious informed consent. Drug trauma or “chemical dissociation” forces the body to dissociate, often triggering pre-existing dissociative episodes. Building on the premise that there is “the body keeps the score” and one “that knows the score”, unresolved traumas, including those induced by drug use, create a memory of mind-body separation that are physically present, not temporary because memories are kept, and that they are as separate as rings are inside the same tree. This perceived and actual dissociation, both natural survival mechanisms, paradoxically initiates a healing process by bringing unconscious material to conscious awareness though imaginal or in vivo reenactment to perform memory reconsolidation. O’Brien proposes that this mind-body relationship and its attachment relational patterns, based in memory formation and processes, can be measured. Wounded Healers Institute offers learning how to know this qualitatively through the Meeting Area Screening and Assessment (MASA) and quantitatively via quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG). Addiction as Dissociation framework underscores the critical need for a paradigm shift towards being dissociation-informed care and morally-driven approaches that recognize the body’s inherent wisdom and the healing potential of dissociation. Concluding that to know who knows nothing is to know the difference between right and wrong, truth and lie, ethics and morals, and who is alive and who is dead inside.
Keywords: Body-Unconscious, Drug Trauma, Dissociation, Systemic Pathology, Moral-Ethics, MASA
Introduction
The prevailing paradigms in medicine, psychology, and law often operate in silos, attempting to define and treat human suffering through fragmented lenses. Addiction, for instance, has been historically debated as either a “disease” or a “choice,” with neither framework fully capturing its complex etiology or the lived experience of those affected. Similarly, societal dysfunctions, from the “War on Drugs” to professional hierarchies, are often viewed as policy failures or individual shortcomings, rather than symptoms of deeper, systemic pathologies. This paper posits a radical hypothesis that challenges these conventional understandings by integrating insights from trauma research, dissociative phenomena, and a critical analysis of institutional behavior. This work builds upon the foundational research of Dr. Adam O’Brien, particularly his dissertation, “Addiction as Trauma-Related Dissociation: A Phenomenological Investigation of the Addictive State” , and the Addiction as Dissociation Model (ADM). It further incorporates critical perspectives on systemic coercive control from Evan Stark PhD and the profound impact of trauma as explored by Dr. Bessel Van der Kolk. The aim is to present a cohesive hypothesis that redefines the relationship between the physical body and the unconscious, re-contextualizes drug use as a traumatic event, and exposes the developmental immaturity and moral failings of the systems that govern health and justice.
The Central Hypothesis: The Physical Body as the Unconscious and Drug Use as Trauma
The core hypothesis presented is that “the physical body is the unconscious,” and that drug use is traumatic because it is foreign and poison and a threat to the unconscious body that is forced to dissociate, triggering previous dissociative episodes.
This hypothesis offers a re-conceptualization of addiction and trauma, challenging several established tenets:
- Redefining Addiction: It moves beyond the “disease” versus “choice” dichotomy, asserting addiction as a manifestation of “trauma-related dissociation”. This is a transdiagnostic perspective, extending beyond substances to include “perfectionistic, altruistic, and ambitious addictions”.
- Drug Use as Trauma: Crucially, it posits that the act of ingesting any drug (illegal or prescribed), regardless of route or potency, is inherently traumatic to the unconscious body. This is a novel departure from traditional views that categorize drug use as self-harm or coping, but not a trauma in its own right.
- Body-Mind Unity: It explicitly links the physical body to the psychological unconscious, suggesting that the body “keeps the score” and “knows the score” of unresolved traumas. This challenges the Cartesian mind-body dualism prevalent in Western medicine.
- Dissociation as Healing: It reframes dissociation not merely as a pathological response, but as an unconscious process initiated by the body to begin healing. The side effects of drug use, often seen as negative, are reinterpreted as symptoms of psychological dissociation, signaling the body’s attempt at repair.
- Systemic Pathology: It extends the concept of individual psychological pathology to entire systems of governance, professions, and corporations, arguing that they can be “sick” and exhibit problematic behaviors akin to addiction and dissociation.
Evolution of Hypothesis
This hypothesis has evolved from several interconnected theoretical and empirical observations:
- Phenomenological Inquiry: Dr. O’Brien’s dissertation, a phenomenological investigation, found that participants in active addiction consistently described their experience as a “dissociative state,” feeling “out of control,” “trapped,” and “enslaved”. This qualitative data revealed underlying themes of trauma and dissociation, which were not fully captured by existing diagnostic criteria.
- Neurobiological Underpinnings: Early work by Van der Kolk, Greenberg, Boyd, & Krystal (1985) suggested that traumatized individuals could become “addicted to trauma” due to the involvement of the endogenous opiate system. This hypothesis expands on this, proposing that the endogenous opiate and cannabinoid systems are involved in dissociation as a survival mechanism, producing states of numbing and healing.
- Philosophical Frameworks: The Eastern concepts of “ultimate reality” (reality as-it-is, neutral) and “mutual arising” (everything is interdependent) provide the philosophical bedrock, allowing for an objective view of addiction as a manifestation of trauma and dissociation on a spectrum.
- Critique of Existing Models: The hypothesis critically reviews existing addiction theories (e.g., Biomedical Model, Allostatic Theory, Self-Medicating Theory, Addiction as Choice, Addiction as Avoidance, Attachment Theory, Natural Addiction Theory) and argues that while they describe aspects of the phenomenon, they fail to identify dissociation as the underlying process or drug use as inherently traumatic.
Importance
The importance of this hypothesis is multi-layered
- Clinical Redefinition: It offers a more comprehensive and operational definition of addiction as “the relationship created between unresolved trauma and the continued and unchecked progression of dissociative responses”. This redefinition has profound implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, shifting focus from punitive or purely pharmacological approaches to trauma-informed care and memory resolution.
- Destigmatization: By framing addiction and dissociation as natural, albeit extreme, survival responses to overwhelming experiences, it destigmatizes these conditions, promoting compassion and understanding.
- Systemic Accountability: It provides a framework for diagnosing and treating systemic pathologies within legal, medical, and psychological professions, highlighting their “addiction to power and control” and their “developmentally immature” state. This calls for a re-alignment of “Legal-Ethics” with “Moral-Ethics”.
- Advocacy for Healing Modalities: It provides a strong scientific and philosophical basis for the therapeutic use of classical psychedelics, arguing that their prohibition is a “war on healing” that prevents access to vital tools for memory reconsolidation and trauma resolution.
The importance of this hypothesis reveals how science, believing in its own hype and historically operating from a developmentally immature, cognitively delayed, and morally unfit legal framework, contributes to societal illness and the same “disease” that is is projected onto those who may not know better. As these systems or rationalistic reasoning projecting apophenia onto clients, the rational addiction is the disease of the disease labeling the other one as the disease. As addiction does not have an accurate definition in the DSM, then society is misinformed by the same systems that believes in what it thinks it knows, but cannot unconsciously confirm their own findings. Therefore, by defining the body as the unconscious is that obtaining unconscious informed consent is philosophically and psychologically valid and sound. What “addiction as dissociation” does is it provides the necessary conceptualization to educated those who do not understand.
Drug Use as Traumatic Dissociation: Mechanisms and Evidence
The central tenet is that the physical body, as the unconscious, registers the ingestion of any drug as a potentially life-threatening event, triggering a dissociative response. This is because the body’s survival-oriented system is “programmed to detect, reject, dispose, and remember for future recall such a substance and/or experience”.
The Body’s Response to “Poison”
Regardless of the drug’s classification (legal, illegal, prescribed), its route of administration, or potency, the body’s initial encounter can produce physical symptoms (e.g., changes in heart rate, nausea, confusion, seizures) that are inherently traumatic from the body’s perspective. This initial impact creates an “addiction memory” akin to a traumatic memory , which can produce similar intrusive symptoms, reenactments, and personality separation.
Dissociation as a Healing Mechanism
When faced with this perceived threat, the unconscious body is “forced to dissociate”. Dissociation, defined as “a division of an individual’s personality” , serves as a survival mechanism, allowing the brain to protect itself from overwhelming emotions and experiences by creating a sense of distance. This “non-real” state (e.g., dorsal vagal response) allows the body to assess, retain energy, and potentially heal. The side effects of drug use, often seen as negative, are reinterpreted as the body’s unconscious attempt to initiate a healing process, producing symptoms of psychological dissociation.
Endogenous Systems and Memory Reconsolidation
The involvement of the endogenous opiate system (producing numbing and relief) and the endocannabinoid system (implicated in physical and psychological healing) in dissociation suggests that these systems facilitate a “healing state”. This hypothesis posits that drug use, by inducing these dissociative states, can inadvertently access memory reconsolidation (MR) processes. MR is the process by which a consolidated memory is reactivated, reviewed, and then stored in a new, less emotionally charged location, leading to symptom elimination. Psychedelics, for instance, have been shown to perform MR, decrease Default Mode Network (DMN) activity, and increase neural activity, facilitating access to unconscious material for healing.
The Unconscious Knows the Score
In a doctor-patient relationship, particularly when a drug is administered, the unconscious body “keeps the score” and “starts to know the score (through qualitative lived experience) before the conscious mind can know”. This “unconscious informed consent” is crucial, as the conscious mind, often unaware of the body’s deeper wisdom, may perceive the drug’s effects as mere side effects, rather than the body’s attempt to heal or communicate distress. The use of adjuvants, triggering autoimmune responses, can further activate unresolved dissociated traumatic memories, registering as “poison, traumatic, and dangerous” to the unconscious body.
The Importance of Naltrexone
The role of Naltrexone provides crucial empirical support for the hypothesis that dissociation underlies all mental health disorders, including addictions. Naltrexone, an opiate antagonist, is not only effective in reducing symptoms of clinical dissociation but is also widely used to treat various substance use disorders, including alcoholism, cocaine dependence, and gambling addiction, with varying degrees of success. Its efficacy extends to behavioral addictions such as “Internet sex addiction,” self-harm, trichotillomania, Borderline Personality Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Eating Disorders. This broad application of Naltrexone strongly suggests a common biological mechanism underlying these diverse presentations. Dr. O’Brien highlights that Naltrexone’s universal application demonstrates how the stress response of dissociation underpins these conditions. The fact that Naltrexone acts on the endogenous opiate system, which is implicated in both trauma and dissociation, further substantiates the biological link between dissociation and the addictive process. This shared neurochemical pathway suggests that dissociation and addiction are, at a fundamental level, biologically related, and can both be understood as states of being “under the influence” of internal physiological responses.
Measuring the Unconscious Body: MASA and qEEG
To bridge the gap between the subjective lived experience of the unconscious body and objective measurement, this hypothesis proposes the integration of qualitative and quantitative tools.
Meeting Area Screening and Assessment (MASA)
MASA is a qualitative screening and assessment tool designed to understand “what is unconsciously occurring” and to obtain “unconscious informed consent” before any treatments or medications are administered. It helps clients increase self-awareness of where psychological material resides and how to navigate it, providing real-time feedback on dissociative and addictive dynamics. MASA is a hybrid of established dissociative techniques (e.g., Dissociative Table) and coping skills, aiming to identify the line between normative and pathological presentations.
Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG)
Complementing MASA, qEEG (Quantitative Electroencephalogram), or “brain mapping,” measures electrical activity in the brain, revealing brain wave patterns associated with stress levels, thought patterns, and emotions. qEEG can identify imbalances in brain activity (too high or too low) and communication between brain cells. It is used to track progress with therapies and can be performed across all ages. By comparing an individual’s qEEG to a normative database, clinicians can identify deviations indicative of neurological or psychiatric conditions. This quantitative measure can provide objective evidence of the mind-body separation and the impact of drug-induced trauma on brain function, offering a measurable correlate to the qualitative insights from MASA.
Systemic Pathology: The Un-Self-Aware Law and Medical Model
This hypothesis extends the concept of individual psychological pathology to societal systems, arguing that they too can be “sick” and exhibit behaviors akin to addiction and dissociation.
Coercive Control and Systemic Trauma
Evan Stark’s work on coercive control, typically applied to interpersonal abuse, describes a pattern of subjugation through intimidation, degradation, isolation, and control. This hypothesis applies this framework to institutions, arguing that governments, legal systems, and professions can exert coercive control over citizens and professionals. The “War on Drugs,” for example, is seen as a strategic course of action using state violence and criminalization to control populations, mirroring abusive tactics. This systemic coercive control perpetuates trauma, leading to a “developmentally traumatized” system that is “addicted to trauma”. Dr. Bessel Van der Kolk’s research on how trauma impacts development and leads to compulsive repetition of harmful patterns supports this idea.
The Medical Model’s Blind Spot is the Law and Psychology
The medical model, while dominant, is critiqued for its “un-self-awareness”. It often medicalizes normal human experiences and is overly influenced by pharmaceutical interests. By defining addiction as a “brain dysfunction” without identifying its cause, it remains theoretically incomplete. This model projects “apophenia” onto patients, misinterpreting the body’s healing signals as pathology. The promotion of “chemical imbalance” theories and “non-addictive opiates” are examples of this projection, demonstrating a system that is “addicted to not knowing” and fears pain and death.
Developmental Immaturity of Law
Psychological science, particularly developmental theories like Piaget’s and Kohlberg’s, suggests that the legal profession operates at a “developmentally immature” stage, akin to a “7-12 year old”. This stage prioritizes rigid rules (“law is law”) over universal ethical principles, leading to a “cognitively delayed” and “morally unfit” system. The law’s inability to adapt to new scientific truths (e.g., on psychedelics or trauma) demonstrates this developmental arrest.
“Separate but Unequal” Professions
The legal system actively creates and maintains unequal professional hierarchies, such as the “diagnostic privilege fiasco” between LMHCs and LCSWs in New York State. This “separate but unequal” dynamic, reminiscent of Plessy v. Ferguson, is not just unfair but actively harmful, hindering effective practice and fueling societal imbalance. It reflects a system “addicted to control” that “will defuse democracy”.
Implicit Government Responsibility and HIPAA Violations
Challenging the Castle Rock v. Gonzales precedent, this hypothesis argues for “implicit responsibility”. If the government is not responsible for harm it did not directly create, it is implicitly responsible for harm caused by its policies (e.g., COVID shutdowns, vaccine mandates, “War on Drugs” transferred to immigration). Furthermore, mass surveillance by agencies like the NSA, collecting citizens’ private health information without “unconscious informed consent,” constitutes a profound HIPAA violation, highlighting the system’s disregard for psychological privacy.
The Dangerous Conflation of Law and Ethics
The societal practice of equating “law” with “ethics” and “morality” is a fundamental deception. Laws are imperfect tools, and a law can be legal yet profoundly unethical (e.g., Fugitive Slave Act). This conflation allows professionals to abdicate moral responsibility by simply following rules, contributing to systemic sickness. The “moral character clause” in professional licensure is rendered hypocritical when professions fail to uphold it in the face of perceived injustices.
Professional Complicity and Dependence
Professionals, by agreeing to give up civil rights for career security, contribute to this systemic pathology. Psychology, in particular, is accused of being “complicit, enabling, and dependent (e.g., addicted)” by not challenging the medical model or the law’s abuses, living in a “dissociated” state. This dependence on external authority prevents true professional autonomy and authentic healing.
Conclusion
As addiction and dissociation are no longer a disease that the system can use establish pathology, system and societal change is needed. Based on the Addiction as Dissociation Model and dissertation research by O’Brien (2023a; 2023b; 2025), this paper hypothesizes that the physical body is the unconscious, and that drug use, regardless of its nature, is a traumatic event to this unconscious body, initiating a dissociative response that paradoxically serves as a healing mechanism. This perspective fundamentally redefines addiction as trauma-related dissociation, a condition rooted in the body’s innate wisdom and its relentless drive for homeostasis. The ability to measure this complex mind-body relationship qualitatively through MASA and quantitatively through qEEG offers a novel pathway for empirical validation.
The implications of this hypothesis extend beyond individual pathology, revealing a profound systemic sickness within our legal, medical, and psychological institutions. These systems, operating from a state of developmental immaturity and a lack of self-awareness, perpetuate coercive control and are “addicted to trauma,” conflating legal compliance with moral rectitude. The “War on Drugs,” professional hierarchies, and the dominance of the medical model are not merely flawed policies but manifestations of this deep-seated institutional illness.
A paradigm shift is urgently needed—one that recognizes the body’s inherent wisdom, prioritizes “Moral-Ethics” over “Legal-Ethics,” and embraces a trauma-informed, dissociative-affirmative approach to healing. This requires challenging the un-self-aware systems that currently govern health and justice, demanding accountability for implicit harms, and fostering a collective awakening to the healing potential of dissociation. Only by integrating the wisdom of the unconscious body with conscious understanding can society move towards true justice, well-being, and collective recovery.
References
Amen Clinics. (n.d.). What is a qEEG? Retrieved from https://www.amenclinics.com/services/qeeg/
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2010). Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews, 35, 217-238.
Bitbrain. (2025, April 30). QEEG Brain Mapping. Retrieved from https://www.bitbrain.com/blog/qeeg-brain-mapping
Corrigan, F. M. (2014). The clinical sequelae of dysfunctional defense responses: Dissociative amnesia, pain and somatization, emotional motor memory, and interoceptive loops. In U. Lanius, S. Paulsen, & F. Corrigan (Eds.), Neurobiology and Treatment of Traumatic Dissociation: Toward an Embodied Self (pp. 153-172). Springer Publishing Company.
Dell, P. F. (2002). Dissociative phenomenology of dissociative identity disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190(1), 10-15.
Ecker, B., Ticic, R., & Hulley, L. (2012). Unlocking the Emotional Brain: Eliminating Symptoms at Their Roots Using Memory Reconsolidation. Routledge.
Fattore, L., Piva, A., Zanda, M., Fumagalli, G., & Chiamulera, C. (2018). Psychedelics and reconsolidation of traumatic and appetitive maladaptive memories: Focus on cannabinoids and ketamine. Psychopharmacology, 235, 433-445.
Feduccia, A. A., & Mithoefer, M. C. (2018). MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD: Are memory reconsolidation and fear extinction underlying mechanisms? Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 84, 221-228.
Fisher, J. (2017). Healing the Fragmented Selves of Trauma Survivors: Overcoming Internal Self-Alienation. Routledge. Van der Kolk, B. A. (1995). The body keeps the score: Memory and the evolving psychobiology of posttraumatic stress. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 1(5), 253-265.
Harvard Business Review. (2018, October). Working with People Who Aren’t Self-Aware. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/10/working-with-people-who-arent-self-aware
Inaba, D. S., & Cohen, W. E. (2014). Uppers, Downers, All Arounders: Physical and Mental Effects of Psychoactive Drugs (8th ed.). CNS Publications, Inc.
Jacobs, D. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2(1), 15-31.
Klanecky, A., McChargue, D. E., & Bruggeman, E. L. (2012). Dissociation and alcohol use: The mediating role of coping motives. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 249-258.
Khantzian, E. J., & Albanese, M. J. (2008). Understanding Addiction as Self-Medication: A Guide for Counselors, Therapists, and Social Workers. Jason Aronson.
Koob, G. F., & Schulkin, J. (2019). Allostasis and Addiction: The Neurobiology of Stress and Reward. Academic Press.
Krediet, E., et al. (2020). Reviewing the potential of psychedelics for the treatment of PTSD. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 23(6), 385-400. \
Landin-Romero, R., et al. (2013). EMDR therapy modulates the default mode network in subsyndromal, traumatized patients. Neuropsychobiology, 67(3), 181-184.
Lanius, U. F., Paulsen, S. L., & Corrigan, F. M. (Eds.). (2014). Neurobiology and Treatment of Traumatic Dissociation: Toward an Embodied Self. Springer Publishing Company.
Lopez-Gimenez, J. F., & Gonzalez-Maeo, J. M. (2018). Hallucinogens and serotonin 5-HT2a receptor-mediated signaled pathways. Current Topics in Behavioral Neuroscience, 36, 45-73.
Maté, G. (2018). In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters With Addiction. North Atlantic Books. Boening, J. (2001). Neurobiology of addiction memory. Journal of Neural Transmission, 108, 755-765.
Najavits, L. M., & Walsh, M. L. (2012). Dissociation, PTSD, and substance abuse: An empirical study. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 13(1), 115-126.
Nijenhuis, E. R. S., & Van der Hart, O. (2011). Dissociation in trauma: A new definition and comparison with previous formulations. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 12(4), 416-445.
O’Brien, A. (2023a). Addiction as Trauma-Related Dissociation: A Phenomenological Investigation of the Addictive State. International University for Graduate Studies.
O’Brien, A. (2023b). Memory Reconsolidation in Psychedelic Therapy. Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved from woundedhealersinstitute.org/
O’Brien, A. (2025). Legalized Psychological Experts. In American Made Addiction Recovery: A Healer’s Journey Through Professional Recovery. Albany, NY: Wounded Healers Institute. Retrieved at woundedhealersinstitute.org/
Palhano-Fontes, F., et al. (2015). The psychedelic state induced by ayahuasca modulates the activity and connectivity of the default mode network. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0118143.
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford University Press.
Psychology Today. (2025, February 24). The Neuroscience of Dissociation. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/an-interpersonal-lens/202502/the-neuroscience-of-dissociation
Rodewald, F., Dell, P. F., Wilhelm-Göbling, C., & Gast, U. (2011). Dissociative disorders: A review of the empirical literature. In P. F. Dell & J. A. O’Neil (Eds.), Dissociation and dissociative disorders: DSM-V and beyond (pp. 155-169). Routledge.
Scaer, R. C. (2005). The Trauma Spectrum: Hidden Wounds and Human Resiliency. W. W. Norton & Company.
Schore, A. N. (2021). The Development of the Unconscious: From Infancy to Adulthood. W. W. Norton & Company.
Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy: Principles, Protocols, and Procedures (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Somer, E., Altus, L., & Ginzburg, K. (2010). Dissociative psychopathology among opioid use disorder patients: Exploring the “chemical dissociation” hypothesis. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51(4), 419-425.
Stark, E. (2007b). Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. Oxford University Press.
Stark, E. (2023). Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Stark, E. (2012). Looking beyond domestic violence: Policing coercive control. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiation, 12(2), 199-203. Dutton, M. A., & Painter, S. L. (1981). Traumatic bonding: The development of emotional attachments in battered women and other relationships of intermittent abuse. Victimology: An International Journal, 6(1-4), 139-155.
Syme, S. L., & Hagen, E. H. (2019). The Social Construction of Health and Illness. In Medical Sociology: An Introduction. Routledge.
Tronick, E. Z. (2007). The Still-Face Experiment.
Van der Kolk, B. A., Greenberg, M. S., Boyd, H., & Krystal, J. H. (1985). Inescapable shock, neurotransmitters, and addiction to trauma: Towards a psychobiology of posttraumatic stress. Society of Biological Psychiatry, 20, 314-325.
Van der Kolk, B. A. (1989). The compulsion to repeat trauma: Re-enactment, revictimization, and masochism. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 12(2), 389-411.
Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Penguin Books.
Verywell Mind. (n.d.). DSM: Friend or Foe? Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/dsm-friend-or-foe-2671930
Waller, N. G., Putnam, F. W., & Carlson, E. B. (1996). Types of dissociation and dissociative disorders: A taxometric analysis of the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Psychological Methods, 1(3), 300-321.
Wounded Healers Institute. (n.d.). Meeting Area Screening and Assessment (MASA). Retrieved from https://woundedhealersinstitute.org/masa/
Yale Law Journal. (2025, March 28). Separation of Drug Scheduling Powers. Retrieved from https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/separation-of-drug-scheduling-powers
Zhang, G., & Stackman, R. W. (2015). The role of serotonin 5-HT2a receptors in memory and cognition. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 6, 225.
